The distinction between buildings, ships, and vessels on the one hand and settlements and areas on the other hand is important for the simulation of evacuation processes. In the case of the evacuation of a whole district, the transport phase (see emergency evacuation) is usually covered by queueing models (see below).
| specific | -- | general |
| phenomenological | -- | first principles |
| discrete | -- | continuous |
| numeric | -- | analytic |
| stochastic | -- | deterministic |
| quantitative | -- | qualitative |
| macroscopic | -- | microscopic |
Queueing models belong to the macroscopic models which are based on the graphical representation of the geometry. The movement of the persons is represented as flow on this graph. Microscopic models on the other hand are based on a detailed representation of geometry and population. If the individuals are autonomy and interact with each other, these models are called Multi-agent systems. Stochastic parameters describe the agents' movement and decisions and represent influences not further specified or which cannot be quantified directly and have to be calibrated via comparison with empirical data. Analytic results are very hard to obtain for social systems. General models can be applied to the evacuation of buildings, aircraft, and ships alike.
Ship motion and/or abnormal floating position may decrease the ability to move. This influence has been investigated experimentally and can be taken into account by reduction factors.
The evacuation of a ship is divided into two separate phases: assembly phase and embarkation phase.
The 90-second rule requires the demonstration that all passengers and crew members can safely abandon the aircraft cabin in less than 90 seconds, with half of the usable exits blocked, with the minimum illumination provided by floor proximity lighting, and a certain age-gender mix in the simulated occupants.
The rule was established in 1965 with 120 seconds, and has been evolving over the years to encompass the improvements in escape equipment, changes in cabin and seat material, and more complete and appropriate crew training.
Very recently, a meaningful move has modified the up to now classical approach with new exit types, new conditions to perform or assess evacuation demonstrations, etc, although some questions are still open. These capacities are completed in the regulations with a series of statements regarding additional interactions and limitations.
The unique objective of the demonstration is to show that the airplane can be evacuated in less than 90 seconds under the aforementioned conditions. So the demonstration provides only a benchmark for consistent evaluation, which allows for comparisons among diverse seating arrangements or modifications in existing airplanes. Obviously, the demonstration can not represent accident scenarios and is not intended for system optimization.