Models can use one or more classifiers in trying to determine the probability of a set of data belonging to another set, say spam or 'ham'.
Many models exist to try to predict on the basis of input data.
Logistic regression is a technique in which unknown values of a discrete variable are predicted based on known values of one or more continuous and/or discrete variables. Logistic regression differs from OLS regression in that the dependent variable is binary in nature. This procedure has many applications. In biostatistics, the researcher may be interested in trying to model the probability of a patient being diagnosed with a certain type of cancer based on knowing, say, the incidence of that cancer in his or her family. In business, the marketer may be interested in modeling the probability of an individual purchasing a product based on the price of that product. Both of these are examples of a simple, binary logistic model. The model is "simple" in that each has only one independent, or predictor, variable, and it is "binary" in that the dependent variable can take on only one of two values: cancer or no cancer, and purchase or does not purchase.
Generally, predictive modeling in archaeology is establishing statistically valid, causal or covariable relationships between natural proxies such as soil types, elevation, slope, vegetation, proximity to water, geology, geomorphology, etc., and the presence of archaeological features. Through analysis of these quantifiable attributes from land that has undergone archaeological survey, sometimes the “archaeological sensitivity” of unsurveyed areas can be anticipated based on the natural proxies in those areas. Large land managers in the United States, such as the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the Department of Defense (DOD), and numerous highway and parks agencies, have successfully employed this strategy. By using predictive modeling in their cultural resource management plans, they are capable of making more informed decisions when planning for activities that have the potential to require ground disturbance and subsequently affect archaeological sites.
Predictive modeling in Health Insurance has several applications, most notably underwriting, capitation payment, and disease management.
Underwriting - Claims based risk adjustment models are used to predict costs for individuals in a future year, based on their demographic and medical and/or claims history. Other predictive models have been developed to help identify better healthcare risks including prescription histories and consumer data.
Capitation payment - Claims based predictive models (typically called risk adjustment models) are used to compensate health plans who attract sicker than average individuals, especially in some public programs such as the Medicare Advantage program. This lessens the incentive for health plans to focus on attracting healthier individuals.
Disease management - Predictive modeling is used in several ways, including adjusting for the relative health of different cohorts of individuals in disease management return on investment studies, and in identifying individuals who are most in need and would benefit the most from interventions.
The Society of Actuaries published a study on the commercially available claims based predictive (risk adjustment) models: http://soa.org/research/health/hlth-risk-assement.aspx
WellNet Healthcare, for example, is a privately held company founded in 1994 that designs, implements and administers employer-sponsored health benefits using predictive-modeling technology licensed from Johns Hopkins University to identify high-risk members and proactively work with them using health-management programs so that catastrophic and costly events are avoided.
For example a large consumer organisation such as a mobile telecommunications operator will have a set of predictive models for product cross-sell, product deep-sell and churn. It is also now more common for such an organisation to have a model of savability using an uplift model. This predicts the likelihood that a customer can be saved at the end of a contract period (the change in churn probability) as opposed to the standard churn prediction model.