From a population health perspective, health has been defined not simply as a state free from disease but as "the capacity of people to adapt to, respond to, or control life's challenges and changes" (Frankish et al., 1996).
Recently, there has been increasing interest from epidemiologists on the subject of economic inequality and its relation to the health of populations. There is a very robust correlation between socioeconomic status and health. This correlation suggests that it is not only the poor who tend to be sick when everyone else is healthy, but that there is a continual gradient, from the top to the bottom of the socioeconomic ladder, relating status to health. This phenomenon is often called the "SES Gradient". Lower socioeconomic status has been linked to chronic stress, heart disease, ulcers, type 2 diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, certain types of cancer, and premature aging.
Despite the reality of the SES Gradient, there is debate as to its cause. A number of researchers (A. Leigh, C. Jencks, A. Clarkwest - see also Russell Sage working papers) see a definite link between economic status and mortality due to the greater economic resources of the better-off, but they find little correlation due to social status differences.
Other researchers such as Richard Wilkinson, J. Lynch , and G.A. Kaplan have found that socioeconomic status strongly affects health even when controlling for economic resources and access to health care. Most famous for linking social status with health are the Whitehall studies - a series of studies conducted on civil servants in London. The studies found that, despite the fact that all civil servants in England have the same access to health care, there was a strong correlation between social status and health. The studies found that this relationship stayed strong even when controlling for health-affecting habits such as exercise, smoking and drinking. Furthermore, it has been noted that no amount of medical attention will help decrease the likelihood of someone getting type 1 diabetes or rheumatoid arthritis - yet both are more common among populations with lower socioeconomic status. Lastly, it has been found that amongst the wealthiest quarter of countries on earth (a set stretching from Luxembourg to Slovakia) there is no relation between a country's wealth and general population health - suggesting that past a certain level, absolute levels of wealth have little impact on population health, but relative levels within a country do.
The concept of psychosocial stress attempts to explain how psychosocial phenomenon such as status and social stratification can lead to the many diseases associated with the SES Gradient. Higher levels of economic inequality tend to intensify social hierarchies and generally degrades the quality of social relations - leading to greater levels of stress and stress related diseases. Richard Wilkinson found this to be true not only for the poorest members of society, but also for the wealthiest. Economic inequality is bad for everyone's health.
Inequality does not only affect the health of human populations. David H. Abbott at the Wisconsin National Primate Research Center found that among many primate species, less egalitarian social structures correlated with higher levels of stress hormones among socially subordinate individuals. Research by Robert Sapolsky of Stanford University provides similar findings.
The importance of Contraceptives
Not everyone is one of the richest countries in the world. Unlike the United States, developing countries around the world have women who’s knowledge of modern life is growing slowly. Contraceptives play a major role in the health of the population. To institute the importance of health, ideas of family planning programs are often introduced to increase women’s awareness of family planning methods. The more informative these methods are, the more likely that people can stay healthy and prevent the spread of disease.References
- Frankish, CJ et al. "Health Impact Assessment as a Tool for Population Health Promotion and Public Policy." Institute of Health Promotion Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver: 1996.
See also
- Auxology
- Economic inequality
- Health Impact Assessment
- List of countries by income equality
- Population Health Forum
- Social determinants of health
- Health disparities
External links
- Population Health MS and PhD Graduate Programs MS and PhD Graduate Programs in Population Health at the University of Wisconsin-Madison
- Population Health Institute Population Health Institute at the University of Wisconsin-Madison
- Canadian Institute for Health Information
- Institute of Population Health Institute of Population Health at the University of Ottawa, Canada
- Examples of population based health management metrics Population Based Health intervention analysis, business case evaluations, epidemiology
- Population and Health Graduate Program Population and Health Graduate Program in the Dept of Population and Family Health Sciences at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
- Population Health Forum website
- A Population-Based Risk Management Framework for Cancer Control
- Public Health Agency of Canada's take on population health
- Canadian Policy Research Secretariate report on population health
- Private Sector Partnerships for Better Health
- Ph.D. in Population Health Progam Ph.D. in Population Health Program at the University of Ottawa, Canada
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Last updated on Friday October 10, 2008 at 11:09:22 PDT (GMT -0700)
View this article at Wikipedia.org - Edit this article at Wikipedia.org - Donate to the Wikimedia Foundation
Copyright © 2009, Dictionary.com, LLC. All rights reserved.