PIK loans are typically unsecured (ie. non-recourse, or not backed by a pledging of assets) or with a deeply subordinated security structure (e.g., third lien). Maturities usually exceed five years and in a standard offer, the loan carries a detachable warrant (the right to purchase a certain number of shares of stock or bonds at a given price for a certain period of time) or a similar mechanism to allow the lender to share in the future success of the business, making it a hybrid security.
Interest on PIK loans is substantially higher than debt of higher priority, thus making the compound interest the dominating part of the repayable principle. In addition, PIK loans typically carry substantial refinancing risk, meaning that the cash flow of the borrower in the repayment period will usually not suffice to repay all monies owed if the company does not perform excellently. By that definition, PIK lenders prefer borrowers with strong growth potential. Because of the flexibility of the loan, also in the long term, there are basically no limits to structures and borrowers. Plus, in most jusrisdictions the accruing interest is tax deductible, providing the borrower with a substantial tax shield.
With a PIK toggle note, the borrower in each interest period has the option to pay interest in cash or to PIK the interest payment. Sometimes, the borrower may also be able to PIK some portion of the interest (usually half) while paying the rest in cash; at times, only some of the interest may be paid in kind and the rest is cash-only. This feature allows the issuers to reduce cash interest payments for a period if necessary. The documentation often provides that if the PIK feature is activated, the interest rate is increased by 25, 50 or 75 basis points.
In some cases, cash payment or PIK is at the discretion of the borrower; in other cases, it is determined by a cash flow trigger. These are sometimes derisively referred to as PIYW (“Pay If You Want”) and PIYC (“Pay If You Can”).
In leveraged buy-outs, a PIK loan is used if the purchase price of the target exceeds leverage levels up to which lenders are willing to provide a senior loan, a second lien loan, or a mezzanine loan, or if there is no cash flow available to service a loan (i. e. due to dividend or merger restrictions). It is typically provided to the acquisition vehicle, either another company or a special purpose entity (SPE), and not to the target itself.
PIK loans in leveraged buy-outs typically carry a substantially higher interest and fee burden than do senior loans, second lien loans, or mezzanine loans of the same transaction. With yield exceeding 20% per annum, the acquirer has to be very diligent in assessing whether the cost of taking out a PIK loan does not outbalance his internal rate of return of equity investment.
Before the credit crunch of Summer 2007, several LBOs have seen some secured second-lien term bank loans coming with PIK or, more frequently, PIK toggle features, in order to support the firm's ability to cover cash interest during the initial period after the LBO. If the acquired company performs well, the PIK toggle feature allows the equity sponsor to avoid giving extraordinary returns to the PIK debt, which might happen if the debt were strictly PIK. Since the credit crunch, the PIK toggle has largely disappeared.
Often such arrangements are referred to by the acronym PIK. Most bonds pay cash, not in kind, coupons.
PIK can be used as a verb (e.g. the bond "PIKed") or an adjective (e.g. that bond is "PIKable"). Where a previously PIKed amount is revoked (as is permissable in some agreements), this is known as "unPIKing".
One high profile use of PIKs involved the controversial takeover of Manchester United Football Club in England by Malcolm Glazer in 2005. Glazer used PIK loans, which were sold to hedge funds, to fund the takeover, much to the displeasure of many of the club’s supporters.