In telecommunication, intersymbol interference (ISI) is a form of distortion of a signal in which one symbol interferes with subsequent symbols. This is an unwanted phenomenon as the previous symbols have similar effect as noise, thus making the communication less reliable. ISI is usually caused by multipath propagation and the inherent non-linear frequency response of a channel. Ways to fight against intersymbol interference include adaptive equalization and error correcting codes.
Another cause of intersymbol interference is the transmission of a signal through a bandlimited channel, i.e., one where the frequency response is zero above a certain frequency (the cutoff frequency). Passing a signal through such a channel results in the removal of frequency components above this cutoff frequency; in addition, the amplitude of the frequency components below the cutoff frequency may also be attenuated by the channel.
This filtering of the transmitted signal affects the shape of the pulse that arrives at the receiver. The first image to the left demonstrates this by showing the effects of filtering a rectangular pulse; not only is the shape of the pulse within the first symbol period changed, but it is spread out over the subsequent symbol periods. When a message is transmitted through such a channel, the spread pulse of each individual symbol will interfere with following symbols.
As opposed to multipath propagation, bandlimited channels are present in both wired and wireless communications. The limitation is often imposed by the desire to operate multiple independent signals through the same area/cable; due to this, each system is typically allocated a piece of the total bandwidth available. For wireless systems, they may be allocated a slice of the electromagnetic spectrum to transmit in (for example, FM radio is often broadcast in the 87.5 MHz - 108 MHz range). This allocation is usually administered by a government agency; in the case of the United States this is the FCC. In a wired system, such as an optical fiber cable, the allocation will be decided by the owner of the cable.
The bandlimiting can also be due to the physical properties of the medium - for instance, the cable being used in a wired system may have a cutoff frequency above which practically none of the transmitted signal will propagate.
Communication systems that transmit data over bandlimited channels usually implement pulse shaping to avoid interference caused by the bandwidth limitation. If the channel frequency response is flat and the shaping filter has a finite bandwidh, it is possible to communicate with no ISI at all. Often the channel response is not known beforehand, and an adaptive equalizer is used to compensate the frequency response.
An eye pattern, which overlays many samples of a signal, can give a graphical representation of the signal characteristics. The first image below is the eye pattern for a binary phase-shift keying (PSK) system in which a one is represented by an amplitude of -1 and a zero by an amplitude of +1. The current sampling time is at the center of the image and the previous and next sampling times are at the edges of the image. The various transitions from one sampling time to another (such as one-to-zero, one-to-one and so forth) can clearly be seen on the diagram.
The noise margin - the amount of noise required to cause the receiver to get an error - is given by the distance between the signal and the zero amplitude point at the sampling time; in other words, the further from zero at the sampling time the signal is the better. For the signal to be correctly interpreted, it must be sampled somewhere between the two points where the zero-to-one and one-to-zero transitions cross. Again, the further apart these points are the better, as this means the signal will be less sensitive to errors in the timing of the samples at the receiver.
The effects of ISI are shown in the second image which is an eye pattern of the same system when operating over a multipath channel. The effects of receiving delayed and distorted versions of the signal can be seen in the loss of definition of the signal transitions. It also reduces both the noise margin and the window in which the signal can be sampled, which shows that the performance of the system will be worse (i.e. it will have a greater bit error ratio).
There are several techniques in telecommunication and data storage that try to work around the problem of intersymbol interference.
US Patent Issued to Seagate Technology on Oct. 16 for "Intersymbol Interference Encoding in a Solid State Drive" (Colorado Inventor)
Oct 22, 2012; ALEXANDRIA, Va., Oct. 22 -- United States Patent no. 8,291,294, issued on Oct. 16, was assigned to Seagate Technology LLC...
US Patent Issued to Seagate Technology on Sept. 13 for "Concurrent Intersymbol Interference Encoding in a Solid State Memory" (Colorado Inventors)
Sep 20, 2011; ALEXANDRIA, Va., Sept. 20 -- United States Patent no. 8,018,766, issued on Sept. 13, was assigned to Seagate Technology LLC...
Patent Issued for Application of a Meta-Viterbi Algorithm for Communication Systems without Intersymbol Interference
Jan 01, 2013; By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Journal of Mathematics -- Broadcom Corporation (Irvine, CA) has been issued patent number...
US Patent Issued to Samsung Electronics on June 28 for "Receiver for Reducing Intersymbol Interference of a Channel and Compensating for Signal Gain Loss, and Method Thereof" (South Korean Inventor)
Jul 04, 2011; ALEXANDRIA, Va., July 4 -- United States Patent no. 7,969,218, issued on June 28, was assigned to Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd....