As the notes were used directly in trade, the goldsmiths noted that people would not usually redeem all their notes at the same time, and saw the opportunity to invest coin reserves in interest-bearing loans and bills. This left the goldsmiths with more notes on issue than reserves to pay them with. This generated income—a process that altered their role from passive guardians of bullion charging fees for safe storage, to interest-paying and earning banks. Fractional-reserve banking was born.
However, if creditors (note holders of gold originally deposited) lost faith in the ability of a bank to redeem (pay) their notes, many would try to redeem their notes at the same time. If in response a bank could not raise enough funds by calling in loans or selling bills, it either went into insolvency or defaulted on its notes. Such a situation is called a bank run and caused the demise of many early banks.
For instance, you could ask to withdraw all the money in your checking account at any time. If all the depositors of a bank did that at the same time (a bank run), the bank could be in trouble. This used to be a rare event, but is recently more commonplace. The Northern Rock crisis of 2007 in the United Kingdom is an example of such an event, as was the collapse of Indymac bank in the United States. The collapse of Wachovia bank in September of 2008 was an example of a "silent run" on the bank, where depositors removed vast sums of money from the bank through electronic transfer. Federal regulators seized Washington Mutual bank September 25, 2008 after a run. It was the largest bank failure in history. Bank failures are not limited to US banks. On October 7, 2008, Iceland nationalized its 2nd largest bank, Landsbanki, following a run by UK depositors.
Fractional-reserve banking works because:
If the net redemption demands are unusually large, the bank will run low on reserves and will be forced to raise new funds from additional borrowings (e.g. by borrowing from the money market or using lines of credit held with other banks), and/or sell assets, to avoid running out of reserves and defaulting on its obligations. If creditors are afraid that the bank is running out of cash, they have an incentive to redeem their deposits as soon as possible, triggering a bank run.
When a loan is funded with central bank money, new commercial bank money is created. As a loan is paid back, the commercial bank money disappears from existence.
The table below displays how loans are funded and how the money supply is affected. It also shows how central bank money is used to create commercial bank money. An initial deposit of $100 of central bank money is lent out 10 times with a fractional-reserve rate of 20%. This means that of the initial $100, 20 percent of it, or $20, is set aside as reserves while the remaining 80 percent, or $80, is loaned out. The recipient of the $80 then spends that money. The receiver of that $80 then deposits it into a bank. The bank then sets aside 20 percent of that $80, or $16, as reserves and lends out the remaining $64. As the process continues, more commercial bank money is created. To simplify the table, a different bank is used for each deposit. In the real world, the money a bank lends may end up in the same bank so it then has more money to lend out.
| Individual Bank | Amount Deposited | Lent Out | Reserves |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 100 | 80 | 20 |
| B | 80 | 64 | 16 |
| C | 64 | 51.20 | 12.80 |
| D | 51.20 | 40.96 | 10.24 |
| E | 40.96 | 32.77 | 8.19 |
| F | 32.77 | 26.21 | 6.55 |
| G | 26.21 | 20.97 | 5.24 |
| H | 20.97 | 16.78 | 4.19 |
| I | 16.78 | 13.42 | 3.36 |
| J | 13.42 | 10.74 | 2.68 |
| K | 10.74 | | |
| | | | Total Reserves: |
| | | | 89.26 |
| | Total Amount Deposited: | Total Amount Lent Out: | Total Reserves + Last Amount Deposited: |
| | 457.05 | 357.05 | 100 |
| | | | |
| | Commercial Bank Money Created + Central Bank Money: | Commercial Bank Money Created: | Central Bank Money: |
| | 457.05 | 357.05 | 100 |
Although no new money was physically created in addition to the initial $100 deposit, new commercial bank money is created through loans. The 2 boxes marked in red show the location of the original $100 deposit throughout the entire process. The total reserves plus the last deposit (or last loan, whichever is last) will always equal the original amount, which in this case is $100. As this process continues, more commercial bank money is created. The amounts in each step decrease towards a limit. If a graph is made showing the accumulation of deposits, one can see that the graph is curved and approaches a limit. This limit is the maximum amount of money that can be created with a given reserve rate. When the reserve rate is 20%, as in the example above, the maximum amount of total deposits that can be created is $500 and the maximum amount of commercial bank money that can be created is $400.
For an individual bank, the deposit is considered a liability whereas the loan it gives out and the reserves are considered assets. The deposit will always be equal to the loan plus the reserve, since the loan and reserve are created from the deposit. This is the basis for a bank's balance sheet.
The creation and destruction of commercial bank money occurs through this process. Whether it is created or destroyed depends on what direction the process moves. When loans are given out, the process moves from the top down and money is created. When loans are paid back, the process moves from the bottom to the top and commercial bank money is canceled out, effectively erasing it from existence.
This table gives an outline of the makeup of money supplies worldwide. Most of the money in any given money supply consists of commercial bank money. The value of commercial bank money comes from the fact that it can be exchanged at a bank for central bank money.
This is a general outline of how it works. The actual increase in the money supply through this process may be lower, as (at each step) banks may choose to hold reserves in excess of the statutory minimum, borrowers may let some funds sit idle, and some borrowers may choose to hold cash, and there may be delays or frictions in the process. It may also be higher if the reserve requirement is lower or if there are no reserve requirements. Government regulations may also be used to limit the money creation process by preventing banks from giving out loans even though the reserve requirements have been fulfilled.
The most common mechanism used to measure this increase in the money supply is typically called the money multiplier. It calculates the maximum amount of money that an initial deposit can be expanded to with a given reserve ratio.
Example
For example, with the reserve ratio of 20 percent, this reserve ratio, R, can also be expressed as a fraction:
The money creation process is affected by the currency drain ratio (the propensity of the public to hold banknotes rather than deposit them with a commercial bank), and the safety reserve ratio (excess reserves beyond the legal requirement that commercial banks voluntarily hold—usually a small amount). Data for "excess" reserves and vault cash are published regularly by the Federal Reserve in the United States. In practice, the actual money multiplier varies over time, and may be substantially lower than the theoretical maximum. It is also important to note that the term 'reserves' in the reserve ratio generally does not include all liquid assets.
Because the nature of fractional-reserve banking involves the possibility of bank runs, central banks have been created throughout the world to address these problems.
Because different funding options have different costs, and differ in reliability, banks maintain a stock of low cost and reliable sources of liquidity such as:
As with reserves, other sources of liquidity are managed with targets.
The ability of the bank to borrow money reliably and economically is crucial, which is why confidence in the bank's creditworthiness is important to its liquidity. This means that the bank needs to maintain adequate capitalisation and to effectively control its exposures to risk in order to continue its operations. If creditors doubt the bank's assets are worth more than its liabilities, all demand creditors have an incentive to demand payment immediately, a situation known as a run on the bank.
Contemporary bank management methods for liquidity are based on maturity analysis of all the bank's assets and liabilities (off balance sheet exposures may also be included). Assets and liabilities are put into residual contractual maturity buckets such as 'on demand', 'less than 1 month', '2-3 months' etc. These residual contractual maturities may be adjusted to account for expected counter party behaviour such as early loan repayments due to borrowers refinancing and expected renewals of term deposits to give forecast cash flows. This analysis highlights any large future net outflows of cash and enables the bank to respond before they occur. Scenario analysis may also be conducted, depicting scenarios including stress scenarios such as a bank-specific crisis.
In a fractional-reserve banking system, in the event of a bank run, the demand depositors and note holders would attempt to withdraw more money than the bank has in reserves, causing the bank to suffer a liquidity crisis and, ultimately, to perhaps default. In the event of a default, the bank would need to liquidate assets and the creditors of the bank would suffer a loss if the proceeds were insufficient to pay its liabilities. Since public deposits are payable on-demand, liquidation may require selling assets quickly and potentially in large enough quantities to affect the price of those assets. An otherwise solvent bank (whose assets are worth more than its liabilities) may be made insolvent by a bank run. This problem potentially exists for any corporation with debt or liabilities, but is more critical for banks as they rely upon public deposits (which may be redeemable upon demand).
Although an initial analysis of a bank run and default points to the bank's inability to liquidate or sell assets (i.e. because the fraction of assets not held in the form of liquid reserves are held in less liquid investments such as loans), a more full analysis indicates that depositors will cause a bank run only when they have a genuine fear of loss of capital, and that banks with a strong risk adjusted capital ratio should be able to liquidate assets and obtain other sources of finance to avoid default. For this reason, fractional-reserve banks have every reason to maintain their liquidity, even at the cost of selling assets at heavy discounts and obtaining finance at high cost, during a bank run (to avoid a total loss for the contributors of the bank's capital, the shareholders).
Many governments have enforced or established deposit insurance systems in order to protect depositors from the event of bank defaults and to help maintain public confidence in the fractional-reserve system.
| Example 2: ANZ National Bank Limited Balance Sheet as at 30 September 2007 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ASSETS | NZ$m | LIABILITIES | NZ$m |
| Cash | 201 | Demand Deposits | 25482 |
| Balance with Central Bank | 2809 | Term Deposits and other borrowings | 35231 |
| Other Liquid Assets | 1797 | Due to Other Financial Institutions | 3170 |
| Due from other Financial Institutions | 3563 | Derivative financial instruments | 4924 |
| Trading Securities | 1887 | Payables and other liabilities | 1351 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 4771 | Provisions | 165 |
| Available for sale assets | 48 | Bonds and Notes | 14607 |
| Net loans and advances | 87878 | Related Party Funding | 2775 |
| Shares in controlled entities | 206 | [subordinated] Loan Capital | 2062 |
| Current Tax Assets | 112 | Total Liabilities | 99084 |
| Other assets | 1045 | Share Capital | 5943 |
| Deferred Tax Assets | 11 | [revaluation] Reserves | 83 |
| Premises and Equipment | 232 | Retained profits | 2667 |
| Goodwill and other intangibles | 3297 | Total Equity | 8703 |
| Total Assets | 107787 | Total Liabilities plus Net Worth | 107787 |
In this example the (legal tender) cash held by the bank is $201m and the demand liabilities of the bank are $25482m, for a (legal tender) cash reserve ratio of 0.79%.
For example the ANZ National Bank Limited balance sheet above gives the following financial ratios:
Clearly, then, it is very important how the term 'reserves' is defined for calculating the reserve ratio, and different definitions give different results. Other important financial ratios may require analysis of disclosures in other parts of the bank's financial statements. In particular, for liquidity risk, disclosures are incorporated into a note to the financial statements that provides maturity analysis of the bank's assets and liabilities and an explanation of how the bank manages its liquidity.
| Example 2: ANZ National Bank Limited Maturity Analysis of Assets and Liabilities as at 30 September 2007 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total carrying value | Less than 3 months | 3-12 months | 1-5 years | Beyond 5 years | No Specified Maturity | |
| Assets | ||||||
| Liquid Assets | 4807 | 4807 | ||||
| Due from other financial institutions | 3563 | 2650 | 440 | 187 | 286 | |
| Derivative Financial Instruments | 4711 | 4711 | ||||
| Assets available for sale | 48 | 33 | 1 | 13 | 1 | |
| Net loans and advances | 87878 | 9276 | 9906 | 24142 | 44905 | |
| Other Assets | 4903 | 970 | 179 | 3754 | ||
| Total Assets | 107787 | 18394 | 10922 | 25013 | 45343 | 8115 |
| Liabilities | ||||||
| Due to other financial institutions | 3170 | 2356 | 405 | 32 | 377 | |
| Deposits and other borrowings | 70030 | 53059 | 14726 | 2245 | ||
| Derivative financial instruments | 4932 | 4932 | ||||
| Other liabilities | 1516 | 1315 | 96 | 32 | 60 | 13 |
| Bonds and notes | 14607 | 672 | 4341 | 9594 | ||
| Related party funding | 2275 | 2275 | ||||
| Loan capital | 2062 | 100 | 1653 | 309 | ||
| Total liabilities | 99084 | 60177 | 19668 | 13556 | 746 | 4937 |
| Net liquidity gap | 8703 | (41783) | (8746) | 11457 | 44597 | 3178 |
| Net liquidity gap - cumulative | 8703 | (41783) | (50529) | (39072) | 5525 | 8703 |
Although an initial analysis of a bank run and default points to the bank's inability to liquidate or sell assets (i.e. because the fraction of assets not held in the form of liquid reserves are held in less liquid investments such as loans), a more full analysis indicates that depositors will cause a bank run only when they have a genuine fear of loss of capital, and that banks with a strong risk adjusted capital ratio should be able to liquidate assets and obtain other sources of finance to avoid default. For this reason, fractional-reserve banks have every reason to maintain their liquidity, even at the cost of selling assets at heavy discounts and obtaining finance at high cost, during a bank run (to avoid a total loss for the contributors of the bank's capital, the shareholders).
Many governments have enforced or established deposit insurance systems in order to protect depositors from the event of bank defaults and to help maintain public confidence in the fractional-reserve system.
Responses to the problem of financial risk described above include:
Most schools of economics recognize the link between money supply and inflation; many mainstream economists, however, consider the issue of money through the banking system as a mechanism of monetary transmission, which a central bank can influence indirectly by raising or lowering interest rates (although banking regulations may also be adjusted to influence the money supply, depending on the circumstances).
Quantity theorists may either be hostile to fractional reserve banking or supportive of minimum reserve ratios and other government controls on the quantity of money created by commercial banks. Some support a gold standard or silver standard to restrain "unfettered", "speculative" fractional-reserve banking activities.
The process with which commercial banks practice fractional-reserve banking is explained at deposit creation multiplier.