In simple cases, l'Hôpital's rule states that for functions f(x) and g(x), if:
,
or:
,
then:
where the prime (') denotes the derivative.
Among other requirements, for this rule to hold, the limit must exist. Other requirements are detailed below, in the formal statement.
Formal statement
When determining the limit of a quotient when both f and g approach 0, or g approaches infinity, l'Hôpital's rule states that if converges, then converges, and to the same limit. This differentiation often simplifies the quotient and/or converts it to a determinate form, allowing the limit to be determined more easily.
Symbolically let . Suppose that , that
lim_{xto c}{f'(x) over g'(x)} = A, A in mathbb{R}^*
and that for all in an open interval (a,b) containing c (or with if or with if ). If
Basic indeterminate forms (all others reduce to these):
Other indeterminate forms:
Note the requirement that the limit exists. Differentiation of limits of this form can sometimes lead to limits that do not exist. In that case, l'Hôpital's rule cannot be applied. For instance if and , then
does not exist, whereas
In practice one often uses the rule and, if the resulting limit exists, concludes that it was legitimate to use l'Hôpital's rule.
Note also the requirement that the derivative of g not vanish throughout an entire interval containing the point c. Without such a hypothesis, the conclusion is false. Thus one must not use l'Hôpital's rule if the denominator oscillates wildly near the point where one is trying to find the limit. For example if and , then
whereas
does not exist since fluctuates between and e.
Examples
Here is an example involving the sinc function, which has the form 0/0:
However, it is simpler to observe that this limit is just the definition of the derivative of sin(x) at x = 0.
In fact this particular limit is needed in the most usual proof that the derivative of sin(x) is cos(x), but we cannot use l'Hôpital's rule to do this, as it would produce a circular argument.
Here is a more elaborate example involving the indeterminate form0/0. Applying the rule a single time still results in an indeterminate form. In this case, the limit may be evaluated by applying l'Hôpital's rule three times:
Here is a classic case involving 0/0. Suppose , then
Here is another case involving 0/0:
=lim_{xto 0}{e^x-1 over 2x}
lim_{xto 0}{e^x over 2}
{1 over 2}
Here is a case of ∞/∞:
lim_{x to infty} frac{sqrt{x}}{ln(x)}
= lim_{x to infty} frac{ 1/(2 sqrt{x}) }{1/x}
= lim_{x to infty} frac{sqrt{x}}{2}
= infty
This one involves ∞/∞. Assume n is a positive integer.
=lim_{xtoinfty}{x^n over e^x}
=lim_{xtoinfty}{nx^{n-1} over e^x}
=nlim_{xtoinfty}{x^{n-1} over e^x}
Iterate the above until the exponent is 0. Then one sees that the limit is 0.
This one also involves ∞/∞:
=lim_{xto 0+}{1/x over -1/x^2}
lim_{xto 0+} -x
0
The previous result can be used in the following case of the indeterminate form : To compute , we rewrite as and get
lim_{xto c}frac{f'(x)}{g'(x)}
= lim_{xito c}frac{f'(xi)}{g'(xi)}
= lim_{xto c}frac{f(x)}{g(x)},
as required.
With the indeterminate form infinity over infinity
This is the case where .
In this case, we only sketch the argument.
Take points satisfying
We can then first take y so close to c that the ratio
frac{f'(xi)}{g'(xi)} is very close to its limit as xito c for all points xi between y and c. Next, as we let xto c, the terms
f(y)/g(x) and g(y)/g(x) go to 0, because lim_{xto c}|g(x)|=infty. The above equality therefore shows that for x close to c, we have f(x)/g(x) close to frac{f'(xi)}{g'(xi)}. Therefore,
The rule can be used on indeterminate forms involving exponents by using logarithms to "move the exponent down." For example, with the indeterminate form 00:
lim_{x to 0} x^x
= lim_{x to 0} exp(ln (x^x))
quad;;;
= lim_{x to 0} exp(x ln x)
quad;;;
= exp(lim_{x to 0} x ln x ).
quad
It is valid to move the limit inside the exponential function, because it is a continuous function. Now the exponent x has been "moved down", so l'Hôpital's rule can be used to evaluate:
lim_{x to 0} x ln x = 0
quad
as shown in an example above. Then:
lim_{x to 0} x^x = exp(0) = 1.
quad
Other methods of computing limits
Although l'Hôpital's rule is a powerful way of computing otherwise hard-to-compute limits, it is not always the easiest. Some limits are actually easier to compute using the Taylor series expansion.
For example
lim_{|x| to infty} x sin {1 over x}
= lim_{|x| to infty} x
left({1 over x} - {1 over x^3 cdot 3!}
+ {1 over x^5 cdot 5!} - cdots right)
;
= lim_{|x| to infty} 1 - {1 over x^2 cdot 3!}
+ {1 over x^4 cdot 5!} - cdots; =; 1.
quad
Some elementary algebraic manipulation, however, yields:
lim_{|x| to infty} {sin {1 over x} over {1 over x}}.
And applying l'Hôpital's rule, we have:
L = lim_{|x| to infty} {{cos {1 over x} cdot {-1 over x^2}}over {-1 over x^2}}
= lim_{|x| to infty} cos{1 over x}
and since the cosine function is continuous for all real numbers, the limit may go "inside" as the argument of cosine
cos{left(lim_{|x| to infty} {1 over x} right)} = cos{0}
1.
On the other hand, a simple substitution also allows the use of l'Hôpital's rule.
Let
mathrm{} u = {1 over x}.
Therefore, as x rightarrow infty , u rightarrow 0^+.
Therefore,
lim_{|x| to infty} x sin {1 over x} = lim_{|u| to 0^+} {1 over u} sin {u} = 1.
Logical circularity
In some cases it may constitute circular reasoning to use l'Hôpital's rule to evaluate such limits as
lim_{hto 0}{(x+h)^n-x^n over h}.
If one uses the evaluation of the limit above for the purpose of proving that
{d over dx} x^n=nx^{n-1},
and one uses l'Hôpital's rule and the fact that
{d over dx} x^n=nx^{n-1},
in the evaluation of the limit, the argument uses the expected proof to prove itself — i.e. begging the question — and is therefore fallacious (even though the conclusion of the proof happens to be true).
Another popular mistake of this nature is the well-known limit
lim_{xto 0} {sin x over x} = 1.
Just as in the previous example, if one proves the differentiation rule for sin(x) with the limit, as is often the case in most calculus books, then it is circular to apply l'Hôpital's rule to evaluate the same limit.